The USA instigated their puppet, (or Tayyip Erdoğan of Georgia), Mikheil Saakashvili, to attack Ossetia for the following evil intentions and caused the killing of about two thousand Muslims. 

1. Before an attack planning for Iran, getting Russia into trouble with Caucasian problems and diminish its reaction force against the USA.  
2. Making Russia -whose intervention was sure to happen- be considered to be "a big threat and hazard" in the world public opinion and in the eyes of the West.   
3. Breaking the ties between Russia and China which has been hosting Olympics and arising as an opponent against the USA.  
4. Driving a wedge between Turkey and Russia, and even trying to involve Turkey in the war in Georgia side on the pretext that "Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline is in danger"
5. Forcing Turkey to be dependent on the USA during the imminent Iran operation.
6. Forming basis for the establishment of Kurdistan in North Iraq if Turkey backs the demands of South Ossetia - where the Muslims are in majority - for full autonomy or federation. 
7. Expediting the participation of Georgia in NATO

 

The USA instigated Saakashvili to attack Ossetia because of these sneaky and imperialist desires, but these plans didn't work. Russia was more courageous and determined than expected. Georgia which intended to ensure and expand its borders has entirely lost Ossetia and Abkhazia. In other words, America has been completely defeated in Caucasia and could not do anything for Saakashvili. Thus, Russia took the chance of executing KKTC (Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus ) model in the Caucasia.                And in the end, Georgia had to accept the crucial conditions set by Russia. According to this truce; a) Peace talks will take place between Georgia and Ossetia, which means, Georgia will recognize Ossetia officially. b) Georgian troops will withdraw from Ossetia their normal bases. c) Georgia will assent to the resolution with the same sort of methods regarding the Abkhazia question. d) Russian peace forces will secure Ossetia and Abkhazia. e) Saakashvili will step aside       These results were the indication of defeat and despair not only or America but for NATO, as well.

            CFR (Council of Foreign Relations) which was the clandestine and deep state of the USA and was under the guidance of Zionist Jews stated that "What has happened in The Caucasia is a kind of show of strength between the West and Russia" and thus they tried to cover up the Zionist defeat and checkmate of Saakashvili who was brought to the power through the hands Soros.  

            Their plans for involving Turkey in the war also did not work.

            Russia immediately contradicted that "they bombed the BTC pipeline"

Furthermore, PKK militants backed by CIA-MOSSAD exploded and set fire to the pipes of the same line in Erzincan district. That's to say, it has been once more understood that Turkey's real enemies are America and Israel but not Russia.

The USA that fooled Saddam and made him enter Kuwait and then formed basis for the invasion of Iraq under this pretext tried the same tactic for Saakashvili but this time these tactics turned out to be useless. And if America, after all, still insists on attacking Iran that will only facilitate the inevitable end for American empire and Israeli terrorism    

Imbalances in the World

Following the Cold War that ended up with the collapse of the Soviet Unions, it was hoped that peace and serenity era would begin for the world. And after the Cold War, the fight for power among the big states took place in a much more bloody way than ever. Because, the monster of Zionism got used to live on blood.

The invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq spearheaded by the USA that remained as a single power after the dissolution of Soviet Unions and the ethnic cleanings emerged in the Balkans after the dissolution of Yugoslavia were the continuation of this power fight. The spark emerged in the Caucasia reminded everyone of the fact that this territory is at high risk. The clash between Georgia and Ossetia in sight was nothing else but a fight between Russia and the USA to control and dominate the Caucasia. While Russia always tried to hold on to the Caucasia (seeing it as a backyard), the USA aimed to wholly settle in Georgia. One of the most important reasons for this clash was the fact that this territory was close to the energy resources and it was in a kind of energy corridor.

Those who have been suffering from the fights of the giants are the small and poor Caucasian communities. Ossetia and Abkhazia today are the victims of the Stalin's policy. It is now quite apparent how Stalin made use of the national and ethnical issues in the Soviet geography. It is the pretext of the problem that Soviet Union split up Ossetia, which was independent when founded, and incorporated the northern Ossetia into Russia and the southern part into Georgia; and Soviet Union also incorporated independent republic of Abkhazia into Georgia as an autonomous republic. And the Zionist centres that want to maintain their sultanate of global exploitation trigger it all indeed. After the USA began to see Georgia as a bridge in the Caucasia, Russia started to support the Southern Ossetia and Abkhazia against the USA- Georgia. Georgia keeps on supporting Chechens against Russia that proclaimed Chechnya secessionist. Caucasia literally is a hot spot.

Delicate position of Turkey

Turkey also has a crucial role in the region and been through hard times. On the one hand, Turkey wants to maintain its close relations with Georgia which constitutes the corridor of Baku-Tiflis-Ceyhan pipeline and the road to the Middle East and strengthen its place in the USA - Georgia - Azerbaijan alliance. On the other hand, Turkey feels obliged to show sensitivity to Ossetia and Abkhazia which are in blood relation with its citizens Caucasian in origin. Turkey also has to avoid being a side in these conflicts due to reasons such as PKK, separatist Kurdish movement and Cyprus question. Fight for power in the Caucasia is gradually drifting Ankara into a difficult situation.  However, the natural richness of the region and a regional cooperation around the founded energy corridor stand out as a development model. Yet, AKP is too far from the capacity to benefit from these balances for national and humanitarian purposes.

The USA that redesigned the region is in an effort to bring Russia to its knees in Ossetia before the attack on Iran!

The USA - Russia war which underwent a kind of gap after the Cold War broke out in the Caucasia as a shooting-war this time. Zionism that has brought about bloody and dirty wars on the small, poor and oppressed countries for years preferred the Caucasia as a new battle field.

The tension came out in the Caucasia after the collapse of the Soviet Union has never ended. Georgia that made the declaration of independence from Russia also comprises three autonomous regions. These are Abkhazia, Acarya and Ossetia. The South Ossetia with 70 thousand population which wants to unite with Autonomous North Ossetia chose, after last year's referendum, the government that eventually wants to join Russia. The USA has been longing to intimidate Russia for a long time. Reminding the support provided to Afghan Mujahids by the U.S.S.R. during the Afghanistan invasion, the USA wants to demolish the influence of Russia on recently segregated independent countries. The USA government apparently shows its support after the coup spearheaded by Shakashvili in Georgia and in return, it is using two thousand Georgian soldiers in the Iraq invasion.     

The history of Ossetia problem

 Georgia gave equal political and social rights to all minorities on 26 May 1989 and enabled them to improve themselves freely; but it decided to close local assemblies in 1919. Georgian sovereignty in South Ossetia came to a close when Red Army entered Georgia on 25 February 1921. South Ossetia was joined to Georgia as "Autonomous Oblast of South Ossetia" in 1922. Although the territory had a quiet period during the times of Soviet Union, it has faced many movements of independence following the dissolution of Soviet Union. The tension between the South Ossetia which was willing to unite with North Ossetia which was one of the sovereign republics of Russian Federation and Georgia has been escalating since the end of 1989. Georgia has showed reaction to Ossetians proclaiming South Ossetia "Soviet Democratic Republic" on 20 September 1990 by announcing annulment of South Ossetia's autonomous status in the same year. 

             South Ossetia Problem

            There are two governments in South Ossetia, one is a government in favour of independence and supported by Russia and the other is assigned by the government of Georgia. The centre of separatist government is Tskhinvali, whereas the centre of the government which Georgia has assigned is Kutra. South Ossetia has been founded as an autonomous oblast on the north of Georgia during the Soviet period. But this status has been removed by the government of Georgia after Georgia declared its independence. Throughout the Soviet Union's dissolution process it made one-sided declaration independence with the support of Moscow government. Meanwhile a "de facto" government appeared by the effect of the agreement to stop the war. Today Tskhinvali which is called the republic of South Ossetia and its neighborhood are controlled by that "de facto" government which is in favour of independence. Almost half of the region is under the control of the government of Georgia.

     At the end of 1991, violence arose in the region. More than one thousand people died, nearly 100 thousand ethnical Ossetians escaped to North Ossetia in the course of these incidents. In the same way 23 thousand Georgians escaped from the region and settled down other regions of Georgia. A ceasefire agreement was signed between Georgia and separatists from North Ossetia in 1992. A peace force consisting of Russians, Georgians and Ossetians has been formed. A mission was established in the region by Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe on 6 November 1992. Then until the midst of 2004 South Ossetia went into hibernation. The tension rose again on 24 June, when Georgian government performed a strict controlling against smuggling in the region. Clashes, bombings and kidnappings came out. But on 13 August another ceasefire agreement was signed.

     Georgia is against increasing Russian political and economical activities and South Ossetia's uncontrolled army. Georgian government authorized temporary South Ossetia Government with an act of parliament on April 2007 to solve the controversy in a peaceful settlement. Those who were in charge of this administration were members the ex-separatist government. In Georgia and in parts of the region that were outside the control of "de facto" government, Temporary South Ossetia Government implemented actions called Kokoiti Fandarast to expel Eduard Kokoiti- a pro-freedom activist - from country in 2007. And Georgia again launched operations on Friday morning of 7 August within "the operation of rebuilding constitutional system" 
 

            The region will become more complicated!

             "Ossetia wants to be an autonomous republic and unite with Russia after detaching from Georgia. Whereas Georgia was saying that it would not permit such a separatist movement. And the day before a border clash fired the wick of the war. Adjara and Abaza are from autonomous elements in the same way. Half of the Ossetia's population is Muslim and the rest   is Orthodox. That war in Caucasia didn't break out suddenly. The tension has been rising for 5-6 years inconspicuously. Caucasian people have warlike mood and when they fight they do their best. Saakashvili completed his education in the West and is a favourite leader for the West. If there is a governor from the West in the region, there can not be any peace in that country. Because, it will be uncertain whether he is working for his own country or for the West. Georgia compressed behind the Balkans wants to be a member of EU but Russia doesn't. There is a possibility of an attack of USA on Iran. Perhaps Saakashvili may have started this war to draw attentions to other side before an attack on Iran. It is a possibility that these are all a kind of put-up job between the USA and Georgia.

             Russia is attacking to military bases and airports. Turkey is training Georgian soldiers. Russia is giving a "It is none of your business!" message to the West by attacking some certain points. Russia is having a recovery process again with Putin and wants to show its strength to the West. In the following years, Caucasus, Khazar and Middle East will gain more strategic importance and fights for power will continue in the region and the region will become much more complicated." 
 

              Turkish-Georgian Business Council Chairman Tuğrul Erkin: 

              Turkey needs Georgia as a gateway to open up to Asian markets, and Turkey also plays an important role as Georgia's window to Europe. In the same time since we don't have any relationship with Armenia, it has a critical role to reach Azerbaijan. Turkey, Azerbaijan and Georgia become a kind of economical union. Georgia is a key point. I hope the war ends as soon as possible. On the other hand, Russia is Turkey's biggest trade partner with a trade volume of $30 billion, and it is also one of two important countries which send tourists and it meets most of the Turkey's energy needs. 

Russia wants to bloody Georgia's nose and teach it a little bit of a lesson

Stephen Larrabee, a RAND Corp. analyst said it was all started by Georgia and Russia would have never permitted Georgia to take such action "without some retaliation". "I think they want to bloody Georgia's nose and teach it a little bit of a lesson, and also to show that they have interests in this region and that they intend to defend those interests," Larrabee said to the French AFP news agency. Russia had recently granted Russian citizenship to whoever wanted it in South Ossetia, giving Moscow a ready excuse to defend its compatriots, Larrabee said. Jeffrey Mankoff of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) said "I don't think the West is going to rescue him, the West is not going to fight a war for him, especially not against Russia.

An expert on Caucasia, journalist Fehim Taştekin:

"The USA is a side of this war!

 It is all because of the tension that has been going up since 2004. Saakashvili sought support from voters during the election by making a promise that he would join Abkhazia and Ossetia to Georgia. And he has been carrying out operations on the Ossetia border for two months. On the other hand, the presence of Russian troops in the region as a peace force made the intervention inevitable. The war suddenly turned into a Georgia-Russia clash. The tension in Abkhazia is still going on and Russia is placing great importance on this region. I don't think that Russia will withdraw unless Georgians pull back. The USA entered the Caucasia through Georgia in 2002. The USA wants to provoke the internal clashes of Russia, too. Given that the arms used are the USA originated, the USA is obviously a side in this war. Russia doesn't want the USA in the region. The convergence between Russia and the USA died out after September 11 attacks. Yet, Russia regained power in the leadership of Putin. The tension of the Cold War came out again. Russia wants to keep the USA and NATO away from its own borders. Turkey is making the mistake of supporting Georgia. Turkey can stand out as a peacemaker in the region."               

Azerbaijan stopped oil supplies!

Shipments of oil and oil products from two of Georgia's ports Kulevi and Batumi have been suspended.

The State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR) and the head of Petkim's board of directors Rövnag Abdullayev made a statement on state television that due to the conflicts in the separatist South Ossetia region they had made the decision to temporarily halt petrol exports the day before. Abdullayev said that they would evaluate exporting from the Baku-Novorosisk (Russia) pipeline, but that this pipeline's capacity was quite low.

Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Grigory Karasin said that Russian battleships in the Black Sea had no plans like preventing oil export from Georgian ports. Karasin, stating at a press conference that they had no plans to prevent oil export from Georgian ports, worded that "I don't know anything about the prevention of sea voyage. Stopping and searching the ships do not mean prevention."  "We need to be careful about what kind of cargo ships go to and come from Georgia if it is a war time" said the Russian diplomat. [1]   

Security alarm in Moscow     

Upon the expanding clashes in the South Ossetia, Russian police increased the security measures in metro and railway stations in Moscow.

Russian Interfax agency announced that identity cards of those who came from Caucasian region were checked at the railway stations. It is also notable that the number of the police cars patrolling in the centre of Moscow has obviously increased. While security measures in the capital of Russia are being increased, there is not much effect of war on the everyday life of metropolitans.[2]                

---

[1] Baku, Moskova, aa

[2] Moskova, aa

yazar:Ahmet Akgül/milliçözüm

Democracy is not a goal but a means.
Upon the closure case of the Justice and Development (AK) Party, some tales about democracy have been told.
Democracy should no be damaged!!!
Everyone should respect the democratic consequences!!!
Democracy has been undergoing a judicial coup!!!
Democracy is essential for everyone every time!!!
Was that democracy a goal or a means?

Is our main concern to save the country or democracy even though the unity and independence of our country, the peace and continuity of our nation is jeopardized by such democracy deceptions? Where will it take Turkey to be instructed by Crusader EU, which haven't put the PKK on the terrorist list and backed Democratic Society Party (DTP) for "Federative Kurdistan" Working backstage, two so-called opposite sides which are under the guidance of Jewish lobbies: The Republican People's Party (CHP) and its adherents rate secularism more highly than our independence, national development, fundamental human rights and the beliefs and wishes of our people and exploits it all the time.. Justice and Development Party (AKP) and its followers rate democracy highly than our national unity and peace, our national security and future and hide behind this concept which, in fact, they never believe in. The closure case should have been opened due to the acceptable and serious reasons: "Handing our sovereignty over to the EU with the new constitution" "Turning Istanbul into a kind of Vatican and providing an ecumenical movement for Patriarchate of Constantinople" "Demolishing 22 Islamic countries including Turkey through Greater Middle East co-chairmanship." "Virtual exploitation of our country by handing all our economic and strategic organizations over to the foreigners." "Corruption of our religion by moderate Islam nonsense and thus degenerating our moral values and seeing secularism as a sovereignty of imperialism " However, it was opened because of the reasons such as "headscarf issue, secularism", which allowed AKP to exploit the feelings of people through unjust treatment and produce political advantage. And this makes the situation easier for those with malicious intentions and confuses the minds.

Meanwhile, the European Parliament was backing AKP and giving instructions.

Here is the report by European Parliament:

"The political procedure is in danger of a coup in Turkey. Prevent it"

The European Parliament's rapporteur on Turkey, Dutch Christian Democrat Ria Oomen-Ruijten expressed that "Unfortunately, there is no judicial system that everyone can trust in Turkey"

Evaluating the recent developments in Turkey, Dutch Christian Democrat Ria Oomen-Ruijten emphasized that "There is an elite segment consisting of the army and the judiciary. Parliament decides by a two-thirds majority to lift headscarf ban (the ban on wearing the headscarf in universities), but it cannot be implemented. I don't know of any other country like this. There is no example of such a thing. I am in favor of the independence of the judiciary but, unfortunately, there is no judiciary in Turkey that everyone can trust. This is a kind of weakness of Turkey. Some studies regarding the judicial system need to be made."

Ria Oomen-Ruijten, emphasized that she was firmly opposed to the closure cases against the ruling Justice and Development Party and the Democratic Society Party and called for "swift judicial reforms concerning the judicial system to overcome the problem."

"A strong message should be sent to the Turkish military. They should stay away from politics in order to allow the emergence of a modern, well-functioning democracy."

Expressing that The Head of Turkish General Staff General Yaşar Büyükanıt visited Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus and gave a message like "we have the first right to speak about the resolution", Oomen-Ruijten expects the army to be constructive in the resolution of the Cyprus issue.

In the draft document the necessity for a comprehensive resolution under UN supervision is emphasized and it is advocated that "the withdrawal of the Turkish troops from the island would facilitate negotiations concerning the resolution"

Joost Lagendijk, co-chair of the EU-Turkey Joint Parliament Committee, gave his thanks to Oomen-Ruijten who prepared the report in an "appropriate manner" and about the recent issues he worded that:

"The indictments against AKP and DTP are still on stand by. We have to be clear on this issue. The closure case filed against the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) is a judicial coup to the political process in Turkey. Choice of the majority of people is "wrong" according to the judiciary. This is absolutely unacceptable. The image of the judiciary is disturbing. Our reaction to the demand for judicial reform in Turkey should be severe."

Keep on investigating Ergenekon illegal network and intensify the investigation!

It is demanded in the draft report that the investigation into the Ergenekon network should go on with determination and "all the connections within the state should be revealed and those in the network should be surrendered to the justice.

A new civic Constitution will be a very important chance in point of "placing the protection of human rights and freedoms into the heart of constitution" and it is also recommended in the report that a massive participation of the civic society in the new constitution studies be provided.

It is stated in the report that commitment of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan "2008 will be a reform year" has been welcomed and another thing emphasized in the report is that depending on the majority in parliament, the determination of the government policy on reforms will play a vital role in the transformation of Turkey into a modern democratic society.

Give priority to the article 301!

According to the document, article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code should be altered depending on the "successive promises given" and it is criticized that new reforms regarding the freedom of expression haven't been made yet.

In the draft report it is stated that "We are pleased for the recognition of foundations law. Examining the text, EU commission should search whether or not it is possible for assets to be administrated, owned or re-seized including those sold to third parties by the non-Muslim minorities."

Following the recognition of Foundations Law, the draft says, Turkish government should fulfill all promises with regard to religious freedom. And the following demands are mentioned in the report; the legal status essential for the activities of all religious communities, education of the spiritual officials, establishing a legal framework regarding the construction of places for worship and hierarchic election, reopening of Heybeliada School for Clerics and the permission for the use of title "ecumenical patriarch"

In the document, Turkish government is called for taking immediate action targeting permanent resolution for the Kurd issue and DTP deputies and mayors are asked to "participate constructively in the political resolution to the Kurd issue in a democratic country, Turkey."

Amendment to the ongoing case is not right! Considering the subsection 3 of the article 138 in Constitution, some law professors allege that constitutional amendments to the ongoing case cannot be made. The related provision: "About an ongoing case, question with regard to the use of judicial authority in Legislative Assembly cannot be put forward and a negotiation or any declaration cannot be made." Prof. Teziç interprets the provision "a negotiation cannot be made" as "constitutional amendment to an ongoing case cannot be made" - Does the provision "a question cannot be put forward, negotiation cannot be made" mean "an oral question cannot be asked, a parliamentary motion cannot be made or a general negotiation cannot be made"? How is "negotiation cannot be made" interpreted as "laws cannot be made, either"? To these objections, professors reply: - "Negotiation cannot be made" includes the negotiations that will be made for the new legal regulation. Turkish Grand National Assembly has to make negotiation while enacting law. One way or another, the ongoing case will have been negotiated during the negotiations over the new law. If there will be an amendment to the law, this will not be in favor of the public, it will be done with the aim of pushing a political party out of a judicial process due to a political purpose. This will be against the Constitution, and at the same time, if there will be an amendment in the Constitution and closing a party will be not possible, then that will aim at depriving the independent democratic order of protecting itself. - You say that legal regulation cannot be made while a case is in progress but while many cases were in progress, the Penal Code could be changed and the favorable ones were put into action. How can you explain that? - And the answer to this question; "Those regulations are general regulations and they are not about a single case." - Another question; "Is the change of conditions for closing a party due to an amendment in Constitution not a general regulation?" - Here is the answer; "Why should AK party make such an amendment? They will do it to have an influence on the case which has already gone to the Constitutional Court. They will do it regarding a case in progress. This not a general but a specific regulation"

The position of the President Gül is controversial.

- Involvement of the President Abdullah Gül in the indictment and the motion for banning him from politics for five years was criticized severely. Lots of legal scholars including some constitutional professors advocated that it was the mistake of the chief prosecutor to involve the President in the indictment although he can only be judged by treason and this kind of indictment is to be turned down by the Constitutional Court even just because of this reason. He is asked for his opinion and the answer is ;

- In the matter of closing a party, the real concern is whether to end the legal personality of a party rather than the infringement of a penal code. And this is not associated with the penal codes. This is a case of closing a legal personality.

Here the indictment against President Gül is that activities and statements of the President during the period when he was a minister or a parliamentarian were considered as one of the reasons or evidences of the formation that established a basis for closure of a party.

On the other hand, the above-mentioned 5-year ban is not a code regulated by the Penal Code; it is a sort of protection required by the Constitution and Political Parties Law. This is also legitimate for the Prime Minister. If there were a penal judgement for the Prime Minister or ministers, the Constitutional Court would judge them under the title of "Supreme Court". [1] Anyhow, the Constitutional Court unanimously accepted the indictment seeking the closure of the ruling Justice and Development Party and the indictment filed against Abdullah Gül by a large majority and this created a shocking effect on the AK party adherents.

Taha Akyol is talking in favor of AK party and giving some warnings;

"While a case is in progress, is it allowed to submit amendment motion with regard to that case?

Yes, it is. While Öcalan was being judged during the Ecevit's government, wee saw that the penal codes were changed!!!

Now, while there are some cases based on the article 301, isn't there a motion to change this article?!!

In every constitutional amendment, aren't there any cases or verdicts reached in the judiciary?

Even there are examples of changing the rules of the game by annulling the law which forms the basis of the case handled by the Constitutional Court itself!!!

Constitutional amendments can be made legally on a few ongoing cases but there are some rules that AK party should never break"

Attitudes of AK party to the constitutional amendments aren't clear yet. But there are three options mentioned;

- To restrict the authorities of chief prosecutor: for instance, some formulas like grounding the indictment for shutting down a party on the approval of the Assembly by inspiring from the German Constitution. Let me state that it would be exactly improper or even endanger the regime to modify the authorities of the chief prosecutor at this stage.

- To change the structure of Constitutional Court: for example, allowing the parliament to elect members for Constitutional Court as in all democratic countries... the Court also has such a demand for a reform regarding this issue. I have been advocating this theory for ages. Nevertheless, while there is a closure case against AK party, it would be a big mistake to attempt to change the structure of the Court. It may lead to developments that will overthrow the regime.

Justice and Development Party (AKP) and National Movement Party (MHP) should never touch the authorities of the chief prosecutor throughout this case.

- To glance at the criteria of Venice Commission: this is possible because it can be thought as a general democratization. For example, adding the "violence" factor to the definition of "formation", issuing some other minor sanctions before the closure sanction... and here it is essential to be cautious.

It will cause a provocation effect!

Attempts like restricting the authorities of the chief prosecutor and changing the structure of the Court are possible in terms of "technical law", but that will be completely inappropriate in point of politics and philosophy of law. It will cause a "provocation" effect exactly.

Holding a referendum on the issue of restricting the authorities of the chief prosecutor and changing the structure of the Court will literally turn this mistake into a political "provocation"[2]


_milli çözüm araştırma ekibi_

---

[1] 21.03.2008 / Fikret Bila / Milliyet

[2] 22.03.2008 / Milliyet

A Jew called Ben-Ami Kadish was arrested in April, 2008 by the U.S Department of Justice and he was released on bail of $300,000 following a brief appearance in a federal court... The reason for arresting this 84 year-old retired mechanical engineer who was born in Connecticut is spying for Israel!

The U.S. government found out that Kadish disclosed all secret documents including information about nuclear weapons, modified F-15 fighters and the Patriot missiles to Israel while working as a mechanical engineer at the United States Army Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center in Dover, New Jersey.

These things happened between the years 1979 and 1985 and Kadish was arrested regardless of his old age.

Even worse, the person who convinced Ben-Ami Kadish to spy for Israel turned out to be the same person who dealt with well-known Israeli agent Jonathan Pollard, who is serving life in prison for spying for Israel.

Through the confidential information given to the U.S. in 2004, even though Israel admitted that the "Pollard" case which led to a serious crisis between two countries was not the only case and there were also a few espionage incidents between 1970s and 1980s, this issue is considered as a new "scandal"...

The development of the Israeli nuclear weapons program was enabled through the secret documents obtained from the U.S. by Jonathan Pollard. Rafi Eitan, a MOSSAD authority who assigned Jonathan Polard, and Israeli foreign ministry advisor Arye Mekel announced immediately that they did not know "Kadish".

Yet, all these things pointed out that Israel consummated its nuclear weapons program by means of an espionage network that was built up in its closest ally. 

Besides, just one year after the capture of Jonathan Pollard in 1985, Mordechai Vanunu, who was employed as a nuclear technician at a Nuclear Research Center located in Dimona, revealed details of Israel's nuclear weapons program to the world. Mordechai Vanunu spent 18 years in prison and Vanunu was released from prison on condition that he would not leave the country and tell what he knew to the people or especially to the foreigners. In the U.S., there was a tough team rising against Israel.  

A former well-known CIA and KGB(as both were under the guidance of zionism) agent Uri Avnery stated these:

My friend Afif Safieh, now the chief Palestine Liberation Organization representative in the US, argues that there are two Americas: the America which exterminated the Native Americans and enslaved the blacks, the America of Hiroshima and McCarthy, and the other America, the America of the Declaration of Independence, of Lincoln, Wilson and Roosevelt.

In these terms, George Bush belongs to the first. Obama, his opposite in almost every respect, represents the second.

One can arrive at Obama by a process of elimination. John McCain is a continuation of Bush. More attractive, probably more intelligent (which doesn't mean much). But he is more of the same. The same policy - a dangerous mix of intoxication with power and simple-mindedness. The same world of the Wild West myth, of Good Guys (Americans and their stooges) and Bad Guys (everybody else). A macho world of sham masculinity, where everything is seen through the sights of a gun.

McCain will go on with the wars, and may start new ones. His economic agenda is the same "swinish capitalism" (Shimon Peres' phrase), which has now brought disaster on the economy of the US, and the economy of all of us.

America needs a complete overhaul. Not just a wash, not just a wax job, not just a new coat of paint. It needs a new motor, a change of the entire leadership, a reappraisal of its position in the world, a change of values.

It must be asked: Is it good for Israel?

All three candidates have groveled at the feet of AIPAC. The fawning of all three before the Israeli leadership is disgusting. They all show a lack of integrity. But I know that they have no choice. That's how it is in the USA.

In spite of this, Obama succeeded in getting out one courageous sentence. Speaking before a mainly Jewish audience in Cleveland, he said: "There is a strain within the pro-Israel community that says unless you adopt an unwavering pro-Likud approach to Israel, you're anti-Israel and that can't be the measure of our friendship with Israel."

I hope that the American Barack (blessed, in Arabic), if elected, will not turn into a replica of the Israeli Barak (lightning, in Hebrew).

Real friendship means: when you see that your friend is drunk, you don't encourage him to drive. You offer to take him home. I am longing for an American president who will have the courage and the honesty to tell our leaders: Dear friends, you are drunk with power! You are speeding along a highway that leads to an abyss!

Yes Palestinian Afif Safieh has noticed a fact, but interpreted it wrong. It is true, there are two Americas: one is under the guidance of Zionist Jewish Lobbies and the other is under the guidance of groups who has been trying to protect the benefits of America and get rid of Zionism. And these two groups have been striving to influence the masses.

What will happen in October?

Aydoğan Vatandaş is summarizing:

Not long ago did I have a dinner with a friend from the USA Ministry of Foreign Affairs and I happened to get some interesting points. 

According to this, the U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney and his team are in a great effort to see the USA attack Syria and Iran in October 2008. The most important reason for this attack will be based on ensuring the security of Israel.    

However, there were remarks in the Washington Post that there was a group in the U.S. Army standing out against this effort. 

There will be presidency elections in November.

American people, in this case, will probably vote for McCain- a republican of military origin rather than Obama, who tends to pursue a passive policy on the Middle East.  

American people will be conditioned to accept that "a woman" can not deal with problems of this kind if Hillary Clinton, not Obama, rises as a rival against McCain. 

That means McCain has a higher chance in both cases of attaining the USA presidency.

Pay attention to October!

Therefore, Turkish domestic policy may shape up on the basis of the calculations of the USA on Syria and Iran.

Because, the USA wants to see Turkey as an ally in such a situation. 

By the way, Turkey has made all its calculations on the possibility that the Democrats win.

What if the Republicans, that is McCain, win the election? This is certainly not a slight chance.

No matter who wins, the USA will try to find out the ways of not withdrawing but staying in Iraq.[1] 

Five years ago, Clinton was fulminating at Bush!

The former President of the USA, Clinton, was railing against present President Bush that "We cannot kill every opponent. We cannot invade all enemy countries."

The former President of the USA was sharply criticizing the present President Bush for his foreign policy. He stated that America would not exterminate all opponent powers or invade all enemy countries.

Clinton emphasized that the USA, sooner or later, had to find a way to cooperate with most of the world and he mentioned the message of Bush administration after 11 September "Everyone in the world should be with us, otherwise go to the hell"  

Explaining that the USA overreacted to France and Germany that objected to the military operation in Iraq, Clinton expressed that the Bush Administration was having difficulties in keeping balance between the national issues and foreign policy.

Why was Kissinger confused?

"When Henry Kissinger opines in an op-ed in the Washington Post, it behooves us all to pay attention. There is a message there. Kissinger has always presented himself as the supreme "realist" proponent on U.S. imperial policy. But he has also always taken care not to distance himself too far from the conservative political Establishment.

First of all, he notes the stakes for the United States in Pakistan. It is a nuclear power that is incapable of maintaining control at home and therefore one that could "turn into the wildcard of international diplomacy." Everyone knows this, he says, but "the remedy has proved elusive." Recent U.S. policy has been to favor a coalition of Musharraf and the civilian parties - a "laudable goal" but not a "practical" one. Elections in a country that does not have a civil society "sharpen" rather than solve crises. Elections, it seems, too often result in electing the wrong people.

For Kissinger, there are nothing but "feudal" forces at play in Pakistan - large landholders in Sindh province (Bhutto's party), commercial classes in the Punjab (Sharif's party), and the military. The struggle among them is like that of the Italian city-states during the Renaissance - shifting alliances and no sense of the "general good." The military are the arbiters in the end. Ergo what? Any attempt by the United States to "manipulate" the political process is likely to "backfire." The "evolution of the immediate political process is beyond our reach."

Yes, Musharraf has been a loyal ally and the United States cannot afford to dissociate itself from him, for it would send a bad message to other loyal allies. But at the same time, it is Musharraf's task - "not ours" - to deal with the results of the election. In short, he is on his own. The United States should not worry about Pakistan politics, only about so-called "national security questions" - control of the nuclear weapons and resistance to terrorists (Islamic radicals).

Kissinger's op-ed was published in the same week that Admiral Fallon resigned from command of U.S. forces in the entire Middle East region. It seems he has said, too often and too loudly, that military action by the United States in Iran is not possible, as a "practical" possibility. Another "realist"? It seems also that Admiral Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has been saying the same thing, if more discreetly. And it seems that Mullen's predecessor, General Pace, also said the same thing. 

Bush and Cheney wish to insist publicly that the military option is on the table, even if it is really off the table. They seem to think this will frighten the Iranians and appease the Israelis. The trouble is that no one believes Bush and Cheney any more, even about what they say they might do, and probably really want to do.

Macho militarism isn't working for the United States these days. Realism as an imperial alternative seems pretty close to a desperate ploy. But are there any other ploys left for the United States in the Middle East?" [2]

Did the countdown begin for the military action by the USA against Iran?

These days the USA is getting prepared to take military action against Iran after Iraq. This shocking claim was made by "US News" magazine that has been watching for the Cheney's Mideast trip. For the magazine, the countdown for Iran has already started.  

 "US News and World Report", a weekly magazine in the USA emphasizes the six signs which signify that the USA military action is only a short time ahead:

1- The resignation of the top U.S. military commander for the Middle East, Admiral William Fallon.

2- The USA Vice President Cheney's Mideast trip/trick

3- The U.S. warships took up positions off Lebanon

4- Israeli President Shimon Peres said that Israel would not be alone at the time of any military action against Iran.

5- Israel's air-strike on a Syrian military installation in Deyr ez-Zor district in Syria 

6- Israel's war with Lebanon in 2006

According to TimeTurk.com, "After the resignation of Fallon, who was considered to be the lone voice against taking military action to stop the Iranian nuclear program, the news about the military action has begun to spread out once more on the American media.

_milliçözüm_

Filistin; Çocuklarında ülkesi…

“12 yaşından Büyükleri vurun” Talimatını bilip de Aldırış etmeyen  

Canlarından ve küçücük bedenlerinden başka silahı olmayan, 

Atmış oldukları, mercimek büyüklüğündeki pişkin tuğladan  

Ve mukbalarıyla  “çevresi mübarek kılınmış” Mescid-i Aksa’yı koruyan çocukların, 

Yani Ebabil kuşlarının ülkesi…

Sırt çantalarına Defter kitap yerine, Bomba dolduran, 

Okul yerine İsrail askerlerinin üzerine, yani ölüme, 

Ölüme başı dik giden, önlükleri  kefen olan çocukların ülkesi... 

Netzarim kavşağında çapraza alınan; Muhammed Cemal ed-Durre nin,  

Tanka taşla direnen Faris’in, Gözünden vurulan Sami’nin  

Ve kurşunun alınlarından öptüğü,  Nice çocuğun isimsiz kahramanların ülkesi… 

Abisi Muhammed Ferhat’ın şehit olduğunu öğrenip de sokakta tatlı dağıtan  

10 yaşındaki çocuğun  “Kudüs’ün Başkent yapıldığını ben göremesem de torunum  

mutlaka görecek” diyen 6 yaşındaki çocuğun ülkesi... 

“Ey her sabah, Çocuklarını öpen babalar!” diye haykıran kızın, 

İslam Tahrir Şibli’nin yani arzın yetim çocuklarının ülkesi

Filistin, Taşlarında ülkesi… 

Bir halkı hç bu kadar ayaklandırmıştı mıydı  

taşlar, Yeryüzünde Filistin’de olduğu kadar… 

Merkhava tanklarına, Sniper,Sharpsooter’lara  karşı,

Esnek meşin ve bir çocuğun çelimsiz kollarından

ettiği, O tarihten beri… 

Ama onlar bizden korkuyor, Biz ise Allah’tan” diyerek Daha da sorumluluk yüklediği  

Filistin direnişinin koca çınarı, Başında kefiyesi, 

Belinde silahıyla yenilmez gerilla liderleri gibi, Ramallah’taki karargâhından  

dünyaya:  “Bu topraklar bizim, asla terk etmeyeceğiz!”diye haykıran   

Ebu Ammar’ın, Yani Arafat’ın da ülkesi… 

Ve Kudüs… 

Adı Barış Şehri(Medinetü-s Selam) olsa da, 

Ona sahip olmak için tarih boyunca sokaklarında akan kanın  

Hiç kurumadığı şehir: Kudüs… 

“Kudüs’ü vermek Tüm Ortadoğu yu, dolayısıyla Arapları, 

Müslümanları küçük düşürmek, yıllardır Siyonistlere karşı verilen savaşı  

Kaybetmek anlamına da gelir”  

Diye düşünen bir halkın Kudüs’ü başkent ilan ettiği ülkenin adı: Filistin… 

Dünyanın hiçbir ülkesi resmi olarak tanımasa da, 

Biz bu ülkeyi tanıyor, bu yüzden de dikkat, ciddiyet ve önem veriyoruz. 

Son söz: Kalbini ferah tut… 

Seviyoruz her gün azalmayı….             

Seviyoruz her gün azalmayı…. 

Seviyoruz her gün azalmayı….